The barriers perceived to prevent the successful implementation of evidence-based practice by speech and language therapists

Background: There is currently a paucity of research investigating what speech and language therapists, in particular, perceive are the greatest barriers to implementing evidence-based practice.

Aims: The purpose of this study was to investigate the perceived barriers that are faced by speech and language therapists in southern Ireland when attempting to implement evidence-based practice.

Methods & Procedures: A 34-item questionnaire was sent to 39 therapists working in several counties in southern Ireland. The survey received an 82.1% (n = 32) response rate.

Outcomes & Results: The results of the study indicated that certain barriers are perceived to prevent evidence-based practice being implemented successfully. The most significant barrier affecting evidence-based practice implementation was reported to be a lack of time to read research (71.9%). Additional barriers that were found to be the most significant were the research having methodological inadequacies (62.5%) and insufficient time to implement new ideas (59.4%). Other important factors identified as being significant barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice were those associated with the quality and presentation of the research, workplace setting, and lack of skills of the therapist. Associations between specific barriers and workplace setting or grade were also investigated. Some possible reasons for these barriers and the implications for clinical practice are also discussed.

Conclusions & Implications: This small study suggests that therapists agreed that evidence-based practice is essential to the practice of speech and language therapy. There are, however, barriers in place that are perceived to prevent its successful implementation. It is hoped that because these barriers have been identified, individual clinicians and organizations can be proactive in aiming to provide an evidence-based service to their clients.

from the International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders

How well do poor language scores at ages 3 and 4 predict poor language scores at age 6?

Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe findings and associations at the group level, and predictive accuracy at the individual level, for three measures of language obtained from a single prospective cohort of US children assessed at three ages during another investigation. Participants comprised all children (n = 414) who had a score at each of three ages (3, 4, and 6 years) on three language measures: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT); mean length of utterance in morphemes (MLU); and total percentage of phonemes correct (TOTPPC) in a nonword repetition task. At the group level, mean differences and correlations over ages were calculated. At the individual level, the extent to which low scores (1.5 SDs or more below the sample mean) at an earlier age increased the relative risk (R’) of low scores at a later age was calculated. At the group level, scores on all measures increased significantly with age. Earlier and later scores on each measure were significantly correlated; r2 values were generally modest (12-59%). A low score at age 3 did not increase the risk of a low score age 4 or age 6 for any of the measures; a low PPVT score at age 4 significantly increased the risk (R’ = 5.0) of a low PPVT score at age 6. For these generally healthy children and these language measures, predictive accuracy at the individual level was generally poor between the ages of 3, 4, and 6 years. Large, longitudinal studies are needed to identify and validate measures for use in identifying preschool children at risk for later language deficits.

from the International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

The barriers perceived to prevent the successful implementation of evidence-based practice by speech and language therapists

Conclusions & Implications: This small study suggests that therapists agreed that evidence-based practice is essential to the practice of speech and language therapy. There are, however, barriers in place that are perceived to prevent its successful implementation. It is hoped that because these barriers have been identified, individual clinicians and organizations can be proactive in aiming to provide an evidence-based service to their clients.

from the International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders